Traditional Diatonic Patterns verses Bilinear Diatonic Patterns
|
|
Linear Pattern 1:
|
|
.Traditional Diatonic Patterns: |
.Bilinear Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Linear Pattern 2:
|
||||||||||
|
.Traditional Diatonic Patterns: |
.Bilinear Equivalents: |
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
While the bilinear keyboard changes the visual appearance of both patterns, there are still only 2 finger-patterns that need to be learned to play each scale (or chord) in any key. Thus, from a mathematical point of view, the bilinear keyboard is 6 times easier than the traditional keyboard. However, because the 2 patterns are simply inversions of each other, it is actually many more times easier.
|
|||||||||||